SELECTED WELFARE PARAMETERS OF BROILER CHICKENS ON DIFFERENT FEED QUANTITY AND TIME

  • K. O. BELLO Department of Animal Production and Health, University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
  • T. S. BODE-KASEEM Department of Animal Production and Health, University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
  • A. O. LALA Department of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Livestock Production, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
  • S. O. OLADELE Ecology and Evolution, School of Life Sciences University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK
  • o. m. SOGUNLE Department of Animal Production and Health, University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
  • O. T. IREKHORE Department of Animal Production and Health, University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
  • B. M. ILORI Department of Animal Production and Health, University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
Keywords: broiler chicken, feed quantity, feeding time, welfare

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine welfare of broiler chickens fed ad libitum and restricted feed during early (08.00hour) and late (16:00hour) of the day. One hundred and eighty (21d old) broiler chickens were randomly allocated to 4 treatments in a 2x2 factorial arrangement comprising of ad libitum and restricted feeding (75% of ad libitum) quantity at 8 and 16 hours feeding time in three replicates. Data were collected on leg problem, dust bathing, body temperature, mortality and haematology. Result revealed that neither feed quantity nor time had significant (P>0.05) effect on leg problem, dust bathing and mortality of broiler chickens. Broiler chickens under ad lib feed quantity and 16:00hours feeding time had (P<0.05) highest body temperature (40.93oC) while those under ad libitum morning (08:00hours) recorded the least (40.75°C). Pack Cell Volume had similar (P>0.05) increase from 26.75% at the beginning (21d) to 31.25 (%) at 56d with broiler chickens under restricted feeding and fed at 16:00hours feeding time. Basophil count reduced from a range of 0.5-2% (P<0.05) to 1% (P>0.05) with restricted feeding. Also eosinophil reduced from 2-4% (P<0.05) range to 0-2.5% (P>0.05) with restricted feeding while birds under ad lib increased from 0-1% (P<0.05) at 21d to 2.75% (P>0.05) at 56d. Better welfare (good body temperature) of broiler chicken could be achieved with early feeding time irrespective of quantity. However, restricted feeding could be explored in broiler production where reduced basophil, eosinophil and stress are vital for enhanced welfare and performance.

 

 

References

Basilio, V. DE, Vilarino, M. Yahav, S. and Picard, M. 2001. Early age thermal conditioning and a dual feeding program for male broilers challenged by heat stress. Poult Sci. 80: 29-36.

Basilio, V. DE, Reaguena, F., Leon, A., Vilarino, M. and Picard, M. 2003. Early age thermal conditioning immediately reduces body temperature of broiler chicks in a tropical environment. Poult. Sci. 82: 1235 – 1241.

Bello, K. O., Eruvbetine, D; Fanimo, O. A. and Aina, A. B. J. 2011. Sensible Heat Balance of Egg-Type Chickens Fed Fermented and Unfermented Groundnut Husk Diets during their Growing and Laying Phase. Nig. J. Anim. Prd. 39 (1): 74-85

Broom, D. M. 1986. Indicators of poor welfare. Br. Vet. J., 142: 524-526.

Cynthia, M. K. 2005. Clinical pathology and procedures – The Merck Veterinary Manual. 9th Edition. Merck and Co., Inc. White house Station, N. J., USA pp 1333 - 1336.

Duncan, I. J. H. 1981. Animal right-Animal welfare. A scientist's assessment. Poultry Sci., 60: 489-499.

Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics. 11:1-42

Edingston, G. M and Gilles, H. M. 1981. Pathology of Haemonchus contortus in the Tropics (2nd Edition). London: Edward Arnold Publisher Ltd.

Esmail, S. H. 2012. Poultry feeding under heat stress conditions. http://www.worldpoultry.net/Broilers/Health/2012/10/Poultry-feeding-under-heat-stress-conditions-1081411W (Accessed May 23, 2014)

Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC), 1992. Report on the Welfare of Broiler Chickens, MAFF, April, 1992. PB0910.

Frandson, R. D. 1986. Anatomy and physiology of farm animals. 4th edition. Published by Philadelphia: Lea &​ Febiger, 1986. Pp 560.
Fraser, A. F. and Broom, A. D. 1990. Welfare terminology and concepts. In: Farm animal behaviour and welfare. BaiillièreTindall, London, 3rd edition, Pp. 256-265.

Hocking, P. M.; Maxwell, M. H.; Mitchell, M. A. 1993. Welfare assessment of broiler breeder and layer females subjected to food restriction and limited access to water during rearing. British Poultry Science 34, 443–458.

Hocking, P. M.; Bernard, R. & Robertson G. W. 2002. Effects of low dietary protein and different allocations of food during rearing and restricted feeding after peak rate of lay on egg production, fertility and hatchability in female broiler breeders. British Poultry Science 43:94 -103.

Hocking, P. M. 2011. Managing Breeding Poultry, Paper delivered at the 1st African International Poultry Summit. Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. Feb 21–25, 2011.

Kestin, S. C.; Knowles, T. G.; Tinch, A. E. and Gregory, N. G. 1992. Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype. Veterinary Record 131: 190-194.

Maxwell, M. H.; Robertson, G. W.; Anderson, I. A.; Dick, L.; Lynch, M. 1991. Haematology and histopathology of seven-week-old broilers after early food restriction. Research in Veterinary Science 50:290-297.

Maxwell, M. H.; Hocking, P. M.; Robertson, G. W. 1992. Differential leucocyte responses to various degrees of food restriction broilers, turkeys and ducks. British Poultry Science 33(1):177-187.

Mitchell, M. A. and Kettlewell, P. J. 1998. Physiological stress and welfare of broiler chickens in transit: solutions not problems! Poultry Science 77: 1803-1814.

Pires, D. L.; Malheiros, E. B.; Boleli, I. C. 2007. Influence of Sex, Age, and Fasting on Blood Parameters and Body, Bursa, Spleen and Yolk Sac Weights of Broiler Chicks. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. ISSN 1516-635X Oct - Dec 2007 / v.9 / n.4 / 221–228

Puppe, B. 1996. Social dominance and rank relationships in domestic pigs: a critical review (Soziale Dominanz- und Rangbeziehungen beim Hausschwein: eine kritische Ubersicht). Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift (abbv. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr). 109 (11-12): 457-464

SAS Institute. 2004 SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cay, NC (Version 9.1.2)

Scientific Committee in Animal Health and Animal Welfare (SCAHAW) 2000. The welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). Report of the Scientific Committee in Animal Health and Animal Welfare. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General, Brussels, Belgium. Home page address: http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scah/out39_en.pdf.

Swick, R. A. 1989. Effect of dietary accidulants and methionine sources on resistance of broiler to heat stress. Zootechnia, December, 1989.
Published
2020-02-13
Section
Original Manuscript