SUBSURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLAND SYSTEM VEGETATED WITH PHRAGMITES KARKA IN THE TREATMENT OF DYE-RICH WASTEWATER

  • A. A. BADEJO Department of Civil Engineering , Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria
  • A. O. COKER Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
  • V. O. OYEDELE 1Department of Civil Engineering , Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria
Keywords: Constructed Wetlands, Dye-rich wastewater, indigo, macrophytes, Phragmites karka

Abstract

Some major parts of tropical Africa, especially in West Africa are nowadays grappling with the problem of degradation of the quality of fresh water by the introduction of effluents containing dyes from textile industries. In this study a low cost and economical method of treating dye-rich effluent using locally available macrophyte was investigated. The pilot Constructed Wetland (CW) consists of 1200 × 1000 × 1000 mm plastic tanks, filled with 500 mm deep 10-15 mm size granite overlaid with 150 mm thick sand (Cu = 1.15 and Cc = 6.8) substrate. The substrates had an hydraulic conductivity of 0.002 m/s. The pilot CW was planted with Phragmites Karka Retz. at 200 mm c/c to provide a high density bed. Irrigation was done intermittently at 6 days retention period with 0.05 m3 indigo dye rich wastewater from the local tie and dye textile industries and plant growth monitored. Physico-chemical parameters, Cr, Pb, Cu, Zn and Fe removal were also evaluated. The study revealed a 24 % growth rate reduction in the plants irrigated with indigo dye-rich wastewater. Reduction of TDS (50 %), TSS (66 %), EC (46 %) were also observed and the heavy metals evaluated showed an uptake of 64 %, 68 %, 78 %, 58 %, and 68 % for Cr, Pb, Zn, Cu, and Fe respectively by the CW. Phragmites karka as a macrophyte in Constructed Wetland was found to be efficient in dye-rich wastewater treatment.

 

 

 

References

Akratos C., Tsihrintzis V. 2007. Effect of Temperature, HRT, Vegetation and Porous Media on Removal Efficiency of Pilot-Scale Horizontal Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands, Ecological Engineering, 29: 173 – 191.

Ayaz, S.C 2008. Post-treatment and reuse of tertiary treated wastewater by constructed wetlands. Desalination 226, 249–255.

Calheiros, C., Rangel, A., Castro, P. 2007. Constructed wetland systems vegetated with different plants applied to the treatment of tannery wastewater. Water Resources 41 (8), 1790–1798.
Carty, A., Miklas, S., Kate, H., Fabrice, G., Atif, M. 2008. The universal design, operation and maintenance guidelines for farm constructed wetlands (FCW) in temperate climates. Bioresource Technology.

Davies, L., Caries, C., Novais, J., Matins-Dias, S. 2005. Phytoremediation of Textile Effluents containing azo dye by using Phragmites australis in a Vertical Flow Intermittently Feeding Constructed Wetland. Ecological Engineering 25, 594-605.

Federal Environmental Protection Agency, (FEPA) 1991. National Guidelines and standards for industrial effluents, gaseous emissions and hazardous waste management in Nigeria. Government notice. P. 49.

Frazer-Williams R. 2007. Constructed Wetlands for advanced treatment and re-use. Centre for Water Science Sustainable Systems Department, School of Applied Science. Cranfield University.

Kadlec, R., Knight, R. 1996 Treatment Wetlands. CRC Press, Inc. Boca. In LaFlamme. C 2005 Nutrient Removal using a Constructed Wetland in Southern Quebec, Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis; McGill University, Montreal.

Ogunfowokan, A., Okoh, E., Adenuga, A., Asubiojo, O. 2005. An Assessment of the Impact of Point Source Pollution from a University Sewage Treatment Oxidation Pond on a Receiving Stream - A Preliminary Study, Journal of Applied Sciences 5 (1): 36-43.

O’Sullivan, A., Conlon, R., Moran, B. Otte, M. 2005. Characteristics of Constructed Wetlands Substrates by Chemical Sequential Extraction and X-ray Diffraction Analysis. Biology and Environment. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. 105B 87-94.

Poe, A., Pichler, M., Thompson, S., Paerl, H. 2003. Denitrification in a constructed wetland receiving agricultural runoff. Wetlands 23: 817–826.

Wagner, S., Truong, P., Vietitz, A., Smeal, A. 2004. Response of Vetiver Grass to Extreme Nitrogen and Phosphorus Supply. Conference Proceeding; Vetiver and Water 3rd International Conference China pg. 61-72.

WHO, 2004. Guidelines For Dinking Water Quality. 3rd Ed. Vol. 1 Recommendation, Geneva, 515.

Windham, L., Weis, J., Weis, P. 2001. Lead Uptake, Distribution and Effects in Two Dominant Salt Marsh Macrophytes. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 42(10): 811 – 816.

Windham, L., Weis J., Weis P. 2003 Uptake and Distribution of Metals in Two Dominant Salt Marsh Macrophytes, Spartina alterniflora (Cordgrass) and Phragmites australis (Common reed). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 56: 63-72.
Published
2014-02-04
Section
Articles