• L . SANNI
  • B . SIWOKU
  • A. M. MARTIN
  • A . WESTBY



Smallholders, women, cassava, market, wealth and food security


Empowering and creating wealth for cassava producing and processing smallholder farmers (of which women constitute the majority) through value addition and competitive market led opportunities for inclusive growth in agriculture is very important to counter poverty and ensure food security. This study attempts to examine the extent to which Cassava: Adding Value for Africa (C : AVA) project in Nigeria has created market led opportunities for smallholder farmers of cassava roots in Southwest Nigeria from 2008 to 2010. Data were collected through interview schedule administered on 237 randomly selected farmers who are participants in C: AVA project registered with the Agricultural Development Project (ADP) in Ogun, Ondo States and Justice, Development and Peace Movement (JDPM). Catholic Diocese of Abeokuta from Ogun State and Ondo State respectively. Data were analyzed descriptively by using measures such as frequency distribution, table, percentages and Chi-square. .The study revealed that 60% of the respondents were men and 40% were women. Men were more educated than women with 28.6% of women farmers having no formal education when compared with 10.3% of men. The difference in income between the third and the fourth quartile was very high compared with other quartiles and the mean income earned by male farmers was more than twice the mean income earned by female farmers. With regards to the level of production there was an increase in the yield of cassava roots on the farms surveyed from the average national range of 10-12 tonnes/ha in 2008 to an average range of 20-25 tonnes/ha in 2010. These improved varieties resulted in an average yield advantage of about 65% over local varieties. Owing to the observable increase in yield, farmers in the study area increased the hectares under cassava from an average of 0.5-1.5 ha in 2008 to an average of 10.0-20.0 ha in 2010. The average annual income of women farmers increased from $1000 in 2008 to an additional average income of $1700 in 2010. Chi-square analysis revealed significant associations (p<0.05) between yield of improved varieties (χ2= 29.187), gender (χ2= 50.632), value addition (χ2= 32.547), improved technologies (χ2= 29.507); Types of market (χ2= 14.743), group membership (χ2= 10.973), capacity building (χ2= 68.490) with income. The study concluded that C: AVA has provided systematic development of specialization in which women cassava roots producers/processors produce specifically for multiple markets to ensure wealth and household food security for women and their households.


Abdulsalam-Saghir, P. 2011. Cassava: Adding Value for Africa: Gender and Diversity as a Driving Force. Agricultural Innovations for Sustainable Development Contributions from Finalists of the 2009/2010 Africa-wide Women and Young Professionals in Science Competitions, CTA Volume 3 Issue 2

Arndt, C., Robinson, S. 2006. Trade reform and gender in Mozambique, Nordic Journal of Political Economy 1(32): 73-89.

Boserup, E, 1970. “Women’s Role in Economic Development.” London. George Allen & Unwin. 283 pages

Fafchamps, M., Quisumbing A 2002. Control of Ownership of Assets within Rural Ethiopian Households, Journal of development Studies 38(6): 47 – 82

Federal Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development, 2007 Women and Development in Nigeria

Food and Agriculture Organization, 2000. Uganda, Gender Differences in Control over and Use of Income (not dated, no author, but Adapted from FAO). IFAD’S Gender Strengthening Program for East and Southern Africa. Uganda Field Diagnostic Study (draft). Rome. [sourced on May 20 2012]

Galab, S., Rao, C. 2003. Women Self-help Groups: poverty alleviation and empowerment. Economic and Poverty Weekly 38 (12/13) 1274 – 1283.

FAO, 2011. State of Food and Agriculture on Women and Agriculture, Rome

Harris-White, B. 1998. Female and male grain marketing systems: Analytic and policy issues for West Africa and India. In Feminist visions of development: Gender analysis and policy, C. Jackson and R. Pearson, eds. New York: Routledge

International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). 2000. IFAD ’ s Gender Strengthening Programme in Eastern and Southern Africa.

Kabeer, N. 2001. Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment: Theory and practice. In discussing women’s empowerment: Theory and Practice. Stockholm: Novum Grafiska, AB.

Njuki, J., Waithanji, E., Kariuki, J., Mburu, S., Lyimo-Macha, J. 2011. Gender and Livestock: Markets, Income and Implications for Food Security in Tanzania and Kenya. Project report submitted to Ford Foundation

Kaplinsky, Rafael., Jeff Readman. 2001. “Integrating SMEs in Global Value Chains: Toward Partnership for Development.” UNIDO.

Morrison, C., Jutting, J. 2005. Women’s discrimination in developing countries. A new data set for better policies, World Development, 33(7): 1065-1081

Morvaridi, B. 1992. Gender Relations in Agriculture. Women in Turkey. Economic Development and cultural Change 40 (3): 567 – 586

Njuki, J, Kaaria, S. Chamunorwa, A., Chiuri W. 2011. – Linking Smallholder Farmers to Markets, Gender and Intra-household Dynamics: Does the Choice of Commodity Matter? European Journal of Development Research

Nweke, F.I.. Spencer, D.S.C, Lynam, J.K. 2002. The Cassava Transformation: Africa’s Best-kept Secret. East Lansing, USA: Michigan State University Press

Phillips, T.P., Taylor, D.S., Sanni, L & Akoroda, M.O. 2004. A Cassava Industrial Revolution in Nigeria: The Potential for a New Industrial Crop. IFAD & FAO, Rome, United Nations

Sanni, L.O., Maziya-Dixon, B., Okoruwa, A.E., Arowosafe, B., Lemchi, J. Ogbe, F., Ezedinma, C., Okechukwu, R.U., Akoroda, M., Okoro, E., Ilona, P., Babaleye, T., Dixon, A. 2007. Cassava Utilization Training for Bakers, Caterers, and Processors in the South-South and SouthEast of Nigeria, IITA, Ibadan

VonBraun, J., Webb, P.J.R. 1989. The impact of new crop technology on the agricultural division of labor in a West African setting. Economic Development and Cultural Change 37(3): 513-534.






Original Manuscript