• E. O. OYEDEPO Department of Agricultural Economics and Farm Management, University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria
  • C. A. AFOLAMI Department of Agricultural Economics and Farm Management, University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria
  • C. A. AFOLAMI Department of Agricultural Economics and Farm Management, University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria
  • A. E. OBAYELU Department of Agricultural Economics and Farm Management Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria
Keywords: Gender, asset distribution, gender analysis, poverty, children’s schooling, rural household


There is growing evidence that the gender distribution of wealth matters especially considering the fact that asset ownership is related to wellbeing, women empowerment and poverty alleviation. Not much is known about the gender distribution of wealth in the rural areas in Ogun state, Nigeria. This study assessed gender and asset distribution in Ogun State, South-west Nigeria using cross-sectional data collected from a total of 260 households selected through a five stage sampling procedure. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics and ordinary least squares multiple regression analysis. The findings from the study shows that an average rural household in the sample was made up of six persons and households were predominantly headed by males (88%). The mean worth of households’ physical assets was ₦1,402,791.00, about 15% of which was owned by women. The ordinary least squares multiple regression analysis revealed that women’s share of assets had a positive influence (P<0.05) on the number of years of formal education completed by children below eighteen years. The education of father and mother were also significant at (P < 0.05) and (P < 0.01) respectively and these show that children have longer access to education when parents have at least secondary school education. Some identified constraints to women asset ownership in the study area were lack of capital (67%), domestic challenges (65%), cultural barriers to female inheritance (56%), and unemployment (52%). Based on these findings it is recommended that women should be encouraged to own more assets so as to be able to positively affect their children’s welfare in terms of education. The economic situation of women can be enhanced by promoting their access to productive assets through indigenous savings and credit associations. The rural households should further be exposed to awareness talks through extension agents stressing the values of education to all in our contemporary world.




Agarwal, B. (1994). “A field of one’s own: Gender and land rights in South Asia”. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Agarwal, B. (1997). “Bargaining and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household”. Feminist Economics, 3 (1):1-51

Beaton, G; and Ghassemi, H. (1982). “Supplementary Feeding Programs for young Children in Developing countries”. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 35 (4); 863 – 916.

Beegle, K., Frankenberg, E. and Thomas, D. (2001). Bargaining Power within Couples and use of Prenatal and Delivery Care in Indonesia. Studies in Family Planning, 32(2), 130-146

Carter, M. R; and Katz, E.G. (1997) “Separate Spheres and the Conjugal Contract; understanding the Impact of General – Biased Development. “In Intra household Resource Allocation in Developing Countries: Methods, Models and policy, ed. L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott and h. Alderman Baltimore, Md. Johns Hopkins University Press

Chiappori, P.A (1988). “Rational Household Labour supply.” Econometrica 56,( 1);63 – 89

Deere, C. D. and Doss, C. (2006). The Gender Asset Gap. What do we know and why does it matter? Feminist Economics 12 (1&2): 1-50.

Duflo, E. ((2000). Grandmothers and Granddaughters: Old age Pension and Intra household Allocation in South Africa ,Mimeo, Department of Economics, Massachusetts institute of technology; Cambridge MA.

Friedemann- sanchez, G. (2006). Assets in Intra household Bargaining among Women workers in Colombia ‘s Cut flower Industry ‘,Feminist Economics 12 (1&2 ) : 247-69.

Fuwa, N.Seiro Ito; Kerosuke K; Takashi K. and Yasuyuki Sawada, (2006). Introduction to a study of intrahousehold resource allocation and gender discrimination in rural and urban Pradesh, India: Journal of Developing Economics, Volume 44; Issue 4, December 2006

Haddad, L. and Kanbur, Ravi (1990). “How serious is the neglect of intra – household inequality? “Economic Journal 100(402): 866 -81

Katz, E. and Chamorro, E. (2003). (Gender, Land rights and the household economy in rural Nicaragua and Honduras’, Paper presented at the annual conference of the Latin American and Caribbean Economics Association, Puebla, Mexico.

Lundberg, S, and Pollak, R.A.( 1993). “Separate Spheres Bargaining and the Marriage Market”. Journal of Political Economy, Vol 101, (6): 988 – 1010.

Manser, M. and Brown, M. (1980) Marriage and household decision making: A bargaining analysis. International Economic Review 21:31-44.

McElroy, M.B and Horney, M. J (1981). “Nash – Bargained household decisions: toward a Generalization of the theory opf Demand”. International Economic Review 22 , No. 2: 333 – 49.

Quisumbing, A.R. and Maluccio, J.A (2003). Resources at Marriage and Intra-household Allocation.Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(3), 283-327.

Thomas, D. 1999. “Intrahousehold Resource Allocation: An Inferential Approach.” Journal of Human Resources 25(4): 635-64.

Panda, P. and B. Agarwal 2005. Marital Violence, Human Development and Women’s property status in India,’ World Development, 33 (5): 823-850.
Original Manuscript